Figure Technologies vs Ondo Finance: Which RWA Wins?

Bill Rice

30+ Years in Mortgage Lending · Founder, Bill Rice Strategy Group

April 1, 2026

Verdict

You're not really choosing between two competitors here. Figure is a lender. Ondo is a yield product. The question is: do you need to borrow against real-world assets, or earn yield on them?

Figure Technologies

Lend APYN/A (originator)
Borrow APR7-15% APR (HELOC)
Max LTV95%
Risk3/10
Try Figure Technologies

Ondo Finance

Lend APY4-5% APY (Treasuries)
Borrow APRN/A (yield product)
Max LTVN/A
Risk2/10
Try Ondo Finance

Figure Technologies vs Ondo Finance

You're not really choosing between two competitors here. Figure is a lender. Ondo is a yield product. The question is: do you need to borrow against real-world assets, or earn yield on them?

Figure uses blockchain to originate home equity loans faster than any traditional bank. Ondo uses blockchain to give investors access to US Treasury yields without a brokerage account. Same RWA category, completely different use cases.

If you own a home and need liquidity, Figure is in the conversation. If you're holding stablecoins and want a safe yield, Ondo is the answer. The overlap is almost zero — which makes this comparison more about clarity than competition.

How They Compare

The structural difference shows up immediately in the numbers. Figure charges borrowers 7–15% APR on HELOCs. Ondo pays depositors 4–5% APY on tokenized Treasuries. One is a cost. One is an income stream.

What is Yield?

The return earned on a crypto investment, typically expressed as APY. In crypto lending, yield comes from interest paid by borrowers, protocol incentives, and governance token rewards.

Full glossary entry
FeatureFigure TechnologiesOndo Finance
Product TypeHELOC / Loans (Borrowing)Tokenized Treasuries (Yield)
Rate7–15% APR (borrowing cost)4–5% APY (yield earned)
CollateralHome equityUS Treasuries
Max LTV95%N/A
Risk Score3/102/10
AuditedYesYes
InsuranceRegulated financial institutionUS Treasury (full faith and credit)
KYC RequiredYesYes (institutional-only)
ChainsProvenance BlockchainEthereum, Solana, Polygon, Arbitrum, Mantle
TVL / Originations$21B+ originations$2.75B+ TVL
Founded20182021

Figure's 95% LTV is the headline number that should catch your attention. Traditional HELOCs typically cap at 80–85% combined loan-to-value. Figure pushing to 95% means more liquidity for homeowners — but also thinner equity cushions if home values drop.

Ondo's 4–5% APY on OUSG is competitive against the current stablecoin average of 5.12%, but it's not chasing yield. It's offering Treasury-grade safety in a tokenized wrapper. That's a different value proposition than chasing the highest DeFi rate.

The Security Question

Both platforms carry low risk scores for good reasons. Figure is a regulated financial institution — it files with the SEC, operates under state lending laws, and has completed a Nasdaq IPO (FIGR). Its loans are originated on Provenance Blockchain, but the legal framework is traditional finance.

What is DeFi?

Decentralized Finance — financial services built on blockchain smart contracts that operate without intermediaries. DeFi lending allows users to lend and borrow directly through protocols rather than banks.

Full glossary entry

Ondo's security case is simpler: OUSG holds short-term US Treasuries and BlackRock's BUIDL fund as its primary asset. The underlying collateral is backed by the full faith and credit of the US government. That's about as close to risk-free as any financial instrument gets.

Both platforms have been audited. Neither has a major incident on record. But the risks that remain are structurally different — and one of them deserves a hard look before you commit capital.

Figure's LTV Risk

Figure's 95% LTV sounds great until home prices fall 10%. At that point, your equity cushion is gone and you're underwater on a HELOC. This isn't a blockchain risk — it's basic real estate risk, and it's the same one that burned millions of homeowners in 2008. High LTV lending is aggressive in any market cycle.

Ondo's main risk isn't the underlying assets — it's access. USDY is available to non-US retail investors, but OUSG is institutional-only with KYC requirements. If you're a US retail investor, your options within Ondo are more limited than the headline numbers suggest.

Who Should Pick Which

Consider James Park — small business owner, sitting on significant home equity, needs working capital without selling assets. Figure's 10-day approval versus the industry's 42-day average is a real operational advantage. For James, Figure isn't a crypto play. It's just a faster, cheaper HELOC.

Now consider Diana Reeves — financial advisor, three clients asking about crypto yield. She needs something she can explain to both a client and a compliance officer. Ondo's USDY or OUSG fits that conversation: Treasury-backed, audited, institutional-grade. That's a product she can defend.

Marcus Thompson — the DeFi optimizer running yield across multiple chains — probably already holds some USDY in his stack. Ondo's multi-chain deployment means he can deploy it across Ethereum, Solana, or Arbitrum depending on where the best yield opportunities sit downstream.

Bill's Take

I've spent 30 years watching mortgage products get dressed up in new language. Figure is doing something genuinely different — blockchain-native origination with real regulatory compliance, not a workaround. But 95% LTV is aggressive regardless of what technology sits underneath it. In traditional lending, we'd call that a high-risk product. The blockchain doesn't change the math on home equity.

The Verdict

Pick Figure if you own a home, need liquidity, and want a faster approval process than any traditional bank can offer. The blockchain infrastructure is a means to an end — what you're actually getting is a regulated HELOC with a 10-day turnaround. That's legitimately useful.

Pick Ondo if you're holding stablecoins or cash equivalents and want Treasury-grade yield without a brokerage account. At 4–5% APY with US government backing, OUSG is one of the most credible yield products in the RWA space right now. Just confirm your eligibility before you try to access OUSG — institutional KYC requirements will stop retail US investors cold.

If you're trying to do both — borrow and earn yield — these platforms don't compete. Use Figure to unlock home equity, deploy the proceeds into something like Ondo's USDY for yield. That's actually a coherent strategy.

Key Takeaway

Figure and Ondo are both legitimate RWA platforms with real regulatory footing. Figure wins for homeowners who need capital fast. Ondo wins for anyone who wants the safest yield in crypto. They're not rivals — they're different tools for different problems.

Disclaimer: This comparison may contain affiliate links. Crypto lending involves significant risk. Always do your own research.

About the Author

Bill Rice

30+ Years in Mortgage Lending · Founder, Bill Rice Strategy Group

Bill Rice is the founder of CryptoLendingHub and Bill Rice Strategy Group (BRSG). With over 30 years of experience in mortgage lending and financial services, he created CryptoLendingHub as a passion project to explore and explain the innovations happening at the intersection of blockchain technology and lending. His deep background in traditional lending — from origination to capital markets — gives him a unique perspective on evaluating crypto lending platforms, tokenized assets, and DeFi protocols.

Connect on LinkedIn

Stay Ahead of the Market

Weekly insights on crypto lending rates, platform reviews, and tokenization trends. Free, no spam.